Standard progress

Formula 1

Formula 1 is a fantastic sport. It has provided combustion engine efficiency technologies, and safety features later used in road cars. An example is the disc brake, which has saved many lives. But even though f1 has strict driver safety rules, it is still one of if not the most dangerous sport in the world, especially in the old days. A driver reacting 6 milliseconds too late could result in fatal injury. Therefore, each driver has to have a special license to race in f1.

This makes me mad:

The word "Formula 1", means that there is a formula, meaning that each car and driver must follow certain rules. The rules in f1 are extremely hard to make. This is because they must excite viewers, and also keep the drivers from dying. In 2016, FIA introduced the hybrid turbo f1 v6 engine. This engine is, boring. It doesnt sound well, it doesnt have a lot of power, and overall formula 1 is losing viewers. I do think that the newest safety features like the halo is necessary for driver safety, but please bring back the no-turbo v10 engines. I`m struggling to like f1, because it is, well, boring. The aerodynamic rules makes overtaking and close racing extremely difficult, because of the turbulent air all the vorteces generate. F1 also has negative feedback loops, rewarding the winners and punishing the losers. This makes the sport even more boring. Yes, they race 300kph cars in city circuits, but it could be so much better.

I can persuade people to see it from my viewpoint, by showing them videos of old f1 cars that not only sounded better, but also looked and in some cases, performed better. Bring back screaming 20 thousand rpm 10 cylinder engines, so that the sport could be saved. Overall, most people are on my side of the argument already, but some believe that f1 should evole into more efficient engines. I understand them, and they do indeed have a point. But we do not do this in other sports, so why in f1? We dont give footballplayers helmets, since it would be safer. We do not make football goals from recycled materials. Why destroy a sport that already was extremely well made?

I think it is important for people to know how good f1 could be, instead of settling with the boring style. People must realize that f1 could be more than environmental friendly, low revving snails going in a circle.

2020

In 2020, FIA will introduce the new f1 rules. These will not bring back the v8 or v10 engines, and that i think will kill f1. People will leave the sport, and slowly, f1 will fade out to nothing. Eventually, f1 will become fully electric. That`s when the sport is dead in my opinion. We already have formula E, that can have electric racing.

Rules

I want to talk about the rules. The f1 rules includes makig an efficient hybrid 1.6L turbo V6 engine. This engine feeds power to the wheels. When braking, the brakes sends power to the battery via the mgu-k (kinetic energy recovering system). The battery can either charge the turbo to eliminate lag, or directly send power to the wheels. The mgu-k, kan charge the battery with 2 megajoules per lap, and send 4 megajoules to the wheels. So you can charge for two laps, and then release an ultra boost of 4 megajoules. Also, to make up for turbulent air slowing down chasing cars, the chasing car is allowed to use DRS on the straights. A DRS lowers air resistance, so that the chasing car has better performance on straights. This is a problem, as many see it as cheating. The areodynamic rules of f1 has to be changed so that they can gain more followers and a larger audience.
That the FIA(they write the rules) doesnt realize the changes that has to be made, and that they ignore the opinions of the audience, makes me mad.

Conclusion
Of course f1 has to evolve, and move into the future. But that doesnt have to be a negative evolution, The FIA could allow low displacement v10 engines, with no rpm resctrictions. That would allow formula 1 to evolve.

US embassy visit

USA

We have received a visit from the United States embassy today.

They explained the differences between our societies, and how things work in the USA compared to Norway. It was a good presentation. The presenter taught us about the American culture, he works at the US embassy, as a security engineer. He is also a trained fireman.

It was a good presentation, and we were allowed to ask questions which lead to us knowing more of the cultural differences. He wasn't allowed to talk about controversial topics, such as gun control.